Vol. 24, No. 1
Allen Bard Awarded
the ACS' Priestley Medal
Allen J. Bard, recipient of
the Priestley Medal
Chemical Society awarded its highest honor, the 2002 Priestley Medal,
to Professor Allen J. Bard of the University of Texas, Austin. Many
IUPAC members know Al Bard personally, especially those who were active
between 1991-93, when he was President and deeply involved in restructuring
the organization. While the Priestley Medal recognizes his distinguished
service to chemistry, Dr. Bard is also best know for his research in
electrochemistry, from fundamental understanding to the develpment of
unique techniques, such as scanning electrochemical microscopy. More
than having a "pure and applied" approach to science, Bard also promotes
the teaching of the field. During his outstanding service as editor
in chief of the Journal of the American Chemical Society, he
served the community by meticulously screening the best scientific reports
for publication in this journal of broad interest. It is not surprising,
therefore, that Bard is also well known as an elder statesman of the
profession who has done much to advance its global influence.CI
spoke with him about what he would like today's IUPAC leaders to accomplish.
What are some of the greatest opportunities for IUPAC ?
think there are a lot of problems in the fundamental and applied sciences
. . . and political problems . . . that IUPAC can play a role in solving.
IUPAC can address such global problems as the environment, energy, and
water resources on a more international scale than even large countries
can by themselves. In fundamental chemistry, IUPAC is poised now to
make important and widely recognized contributions in nanoscience, molecular
electronics, materials science, and other areas.
What about recognition for IUPAC itself?
IUPAC does important work and addresses problems significant to industries
and governments, it will be recognized. The key issue is, how important
is IUPAC and what it's doing? If members come out with good reports
that back up their views on important issues, I think they will be publicized.
As President of IUPAC, you strongly encouraged restructuring in order
to focus resources on high-priority projects. Does
the current structure achieve what you had hoped for?
a question of timing and the speed of getting things out.
The tradition of IUPAC had been to do very careful, very good work at
a leisurely pace. So it spent four or six or even eight years to address
fairly non-critical problems.
Clearly, in today's faster-paced world, that's not good enough for addressing
problems people care about. The new structure is better. It's attuned
to identifying a problem through, let's say, the divisional structure,
rapidly getting together a group that can address that problem, and
giving them the support to complete the study in a relatively short
time. The key issue is to identify an important project and get the
best people who are willing to work on it and I think good people
will be willing to work on an important project. Give them the resources
to meet a few timesnot just once every two yearsand let
them publish their report in a timely manner.
Speaking of resources, what can IUPAC do to address disparities in resources
and standards among member countries?
terms of resources, I don't think IUPAC can make a very big difference,
but it can and does play a role in establishing world-wide
standards and making these standards clear to developing countries.
IUPAC could perhaps try to leverage its funding by doing collaborative
studies with other international organizations.
With so many multidisciplinary issues in the sciences, would your suggestion
to collaborate with other organizations possibly broaden IUPAC's professional
base as well?
right. Various organizationsUNESCO and othersare concerned
with interdisciplinary problems that are within the broad scope of IUPAC
. We ought to be working more closely and more frequently with them
on a wide range of cross-cutting issues.